Personal recollections of the academic grant writing process.

Background

Of the many types of writing one undertakes in a typical academic career, grant writing stands out as a rather large anomaly. For the purposes of this post, we will note that an academic writing taxonomy would consist of roughly:

Coursework and Assignmets
These are more or less comparitive writing exercises, where the only main thing which is enforced is (or should be) plagiarism checks. In terms of locality in history, these are more or less focused on the past, with little to no original content.
Peer Reviewed Articles
Broadly, in this category we can lump society journals, some conference articles, and even reviews to some extent. These are hyper-local in time, with enough historical perspective to make the paper worthwhile for the journal/conference, and originality of content is a key highlight.
Grants
Grants are unique. They are both short (in terms of a prospectus) and also long, in that there are a huge number of auxillary files to be added.

Grants

At some stage, every researcher who doesn’t bow out of academia ends up faced with the prospect of proving to a funding agency that they are capable and well-adjusted enough to get money for an extended amount of time.

Lit Surveys

Unlike papers and reviews, though recent papers are important, it is more relevant to actually project where the field will be in upcoming years to ensure the deliverables are not out-dated. Additionally, it is best to link to widely cited literature, to ensure that the reviewers believe in your holistic understanding.

Deliverables

This part is fun to write, building towards a goal, is a special kind of write up. It allows one to really flesh out a research plan with realistic goals.

Extras

  • For most applications, there is a budgetary requirement, mostly with a spreadsheet component.
  • A Gantt chartis also often required
    • I started with teamgantt, which was neat
    • Of course I eventually ended up regressing to orgmode and TeX using org-gantt
      • This actually would need a whole other post, but it is great

Conclusions

If this post seemed short, it is probably because even though a lot else went into the proposal, until I hear otherwise next year, it would be presumptous to write more. That said, it was and is an enjoyable exercise.